Battle: Los Angeles


Columbia Pictures

Directed by Jonathan Liebesman

Produced by Jeffrey Chernov and Neal H. Moritz

Written by Christopher Bertolini

Much of the creative entertainments we enjoy are done according to formula, agreed?  Why is such practiced, especially in movies?  Because there are certain movie formulas that are guaranteed to work no matter if the movie is made in 1959 or 1977 or in 2011.  Criticizing a Western for having gunfights at high noon, horses and buffalos is kinda silly because when you watch a Western you have certain expectations of what you’re going to see.  After all, isn’t that why you’re watching a Western?  Because you know the formula, you just want to see them played out in a different mix, is all.

Now, as my dear Aunt Lottie would put it; I say that to say this: I’ve read reviews criticizing BATTLE: LOS ANGELES for being a cliché war movie.  Not that the reviews are wrong.  In fact, it is a cliché war movie.  This is exactly the same kind of movie John Wayne and Audie Murphy were making back in the 40’s and 50’s except the enemies were German and Japanese soldiers, not aliens.  In fact, this could have been a war movie set in Afghanistan or Iraq as that’s how it’s played out: as a modern day war movie.  The only exceptional thing about the enemy is that they come from Outer Space and not Over There.

Meteors land in the waters off major coastal cities.  And inside the meteors are spacecraft containing hostile alien soldiers that swiftly spread into the cities, killing every human in sight.  They make no effort at communication and are not interested in taking prisoners for anal probing.  They’re simply and efficiently going about the job of exterminating the human race.

Marine Staff Sergeant Nanze (Aaron Eckhart) is forced to put off his retirement as he has to replace a platoon sergeant for an important mission.  The platoon he’s assigned to has to rescue civilians from an LAPD station within three hours.  That’s when the Air Force is going to carpet bomb the area.  The platoon commander, Lt. Martinez (Ramon Rodriguez) is kinda leery about Nanze.  The Staff Sergeant is a good Marine, no doubt about that.  But a lot of rumors about Nanze’s last mission have been floating around Camp Pendleton that he doesn’t like.  But orders are orders and so the platoon is off on their mission.  One that swiftly goes wrong as they are ambushed time and again by the relentless alien invaders.

All that you can get just from the TV commercials and the trailers.  BATTLE: LOS ANGELES isn’t trying to make you think it’s going to be one thing, then get you in the theater to find out it’s something else.  It’s about a platoon of Marines trying their best to survive against an enemy they never dreamed they’d be facing.  The movie is as brutally uncomplicated as a cast iron skillet upside the head.  Before the invasion, we get brief vignettes of the various platoon members and they each are a proven War Movie Type: The Green Lieutenant Who Has No Combat Experience.  The Virgin.  The Heroic Black Guy.  The Soldier With A Dark Past.  The Soldier Who Choked Under Fire And Fears He’s A Coward.  And as you watch each one of their vignettes, go ahead and play the game of Who Gets Killed And In Which Order.

So what’s right about the movie?  Aaron Eckhart, who I’m convinced is incapable of turning in a bad performance.  He plays his role as if he’s assuming you’ve never seen a War Movie before.  Michelle Rodriguez surprised me in this one.  Usually she plays one of two roles: The Pissed-Off Latina With Bigger Balls Than Any Man or The Really Pissed-Off Latina With Bigger Balls Than Any Man.  But in this movie she dials her usual anger way back and comes off more as a person and less like a stereotype.

I also liked how we never really get to know the aliens or why they’re here.  Oh, there’s some kind of technobabble about them needing our resources but it’s really not necessary.  They’re The Enemy and that’s all we need to know.  The aliens are tough mollyfoggers but they’re not indestructible.  They’re worthy adversaries for the platoon.

What didn’t I like?  That damn shaky-cam.  The use of it renders the firefights a jumble of meaningless images.  The use of shaky-cam in this movie is so bad that in the first two firefights I could swear that the entire platoon was wiped out and I was honestly surprised when everybody regrouped alive and well.  Once the action starts, the Marines are difficult to tell apart.

So should you see BATTLE: LOS ANGELES?  Definitely.  It’s the very essence of a summer popcorn movie.

116 minutes



10 thoughts on “Battle: Los Angeles

  1. I enjoyed the movie enough to see it at the theater and then later on Netflicks, but still have some problems with some of the writing. Not really the military part, though I thought it kind of stupid that they flew over the beach in slow helicopters and not one was shot down, while later in the movie the aliens were knocking jets out of the air at will. Also, the tired old trope of aliens out for our resources just doesn’t fly. Need metals and organics, there are trillions of tons of the stuff in the asteroid belt for the taking. Water? There are enough iceballs in the Kuiper Belt and Ort Clouds to fill a thousand oceans. And you don’t have to fight over it.

    1. I know. It always gets a big laugh out of me when the excuse for an alien invasion is that they need our resources. Any race that can build a fleet of mile long spaceships doesn’t need any of OUR resources, that’s for sure.

  2. I enjoy this movie for the very reason why most critics didn’t like, true military behavior. It is odd that critics would complain about something that has been done in multiple movies. The acting was good, not awarding winning. The action was well paced and not Bay-type of thrown in to have thing explode on-screen. The ending wasn’t a happy ever after type you sometimes get in these type of movies.

  3. I gotta agree, the poor reviews for Battle Los Angeles are just baffling.

    I mean, it’s not District 9, but it’s alot like Die Hard. It doesn’t reinvent the wheel, it just does it’s job *well*. You don’t have to turn your brain completely off, and the action scenes amazing.

    1. That’s my thinking exactly. BATTLE: LOS ANGELES isn’t trying to be revolutionary or groundbreaking. It’s telling a story we’ve seen in a dozen war movies but it does it well and with intelligence. And sometimes that’s all you want. Not every movie has to or should be “Inception”

    1. No doubt. In fact, if I had known the shaky-cam was going to be this extreme, I’d have waited for it to come on DVD my own self. Shaky-cam doesn’t bother me on TV but on a huge screen it’s just too much. To date, the only movie I condone and even approve of shaky-cam is “Cloverfield”. And that’s because their was a good reason for it.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s